Friday, March 9, 2007

If Ali G were the Chairman of the Fed...

YouTube - Ali G - Economics and Selling Stocks High

Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, you could seriously learn from this genius of monetary policy.
"Listen up, pay attention, and be careful wif' yo' cash... if you wanna get to be wearin' bling." -Ali G

powered by performancing firefox

Oh my, oh Mao... a bourgeois revolution in China?

Leader: Property rights in China | China's next revolution | Economist.com

Full article: Governing China | Caught between right and left, town and country | Economist.com

Interesting article about the emerging development of property rights in China. The question is, whose rights will the new laws protect? The peasants in the countryside who have farmed their land for generations but technically still "lease" it from the communist party? Or the middle class elite who have "looted the state as it has privatized assets". The article suggests two possible revolutions on the horizon, one decidedly anti-Maoist: the one led by the "property-owning middle class" that new property right laws will help, and the other the backlash of the frustrated peasant class in the countryside who may be left behind by the proposed laws.
"Clearer, enforceable property rights are essential if China's fantastic 30-year boom is to continue and if the tensions it has generated are to be managed without widespread violence."
North America Issue Cover for Mar 10th 2007

powered by performancing firefox

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Our fearless president's incredible understanding of Economic theory

Bushism of the day. - By Jacob Weisberg - Slate Magazine
"Trade is an important subject here at Caterpillar, and the reason why is because a lot of the product you make here, you sell to somebody else, sell overseas to another country. That's trade. And yet it's—it's a topic of hot debate."—Speaking to workers at the Caterpillar equipment company, East Peoria, Ill., Jan. 30, 2007
powered by performancing firefox

Hip Hop Economics

YouTube - Def Poet Tommy Bottoms

Is AP or IB Econ getting you down? McConnell and Brue just doesn't do it for you? How about some hip hop economics. Check out the YouTube video linked above and post your comments below. Here's some of the lyrics from this enlightening take on the dismal science.

“Basic Economics,” by Tommy Bottoms

"...See America is designed for the get rich. There’s a million and one ways for you to get paid off of this bitch. And most of them’s legit. Just find a market you want to target, produce a service and/or product and your revenue minus your expenses is going to equal your profit. See, it’s just basic economics. As long as you have the haves, you’ll always have the have nots, so it’s up to you to decide whether or not you’re happy with what you got...

Now, I know I spit this poem with a whole lot of Ebonics, but it don’t matter who say it or how it’s been said, it’s still just basic economics."

powered by performancing firefox

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Response to Marco's bashing of the Coase Theorem

Marco's IB Economics Blog: The Coase Theorem Is The Low Point Of Economic Study

In the above post, Marco bashes the Coase Theorem as a means of externality reduction pretty badly. While some of his ideas are founded, I've decided to respond with my own...

Interesting argument, Marco. I like the idea of Dick buying more and more dogs to extort money from Jane! Classic! I believe the point of the Coase theorem is to show that if property rights are clearly defined, and the number of parties involved in an externality is limited, direct negotiation can result in a socially optimal result. All it's saying is that government may not be required in all cases! Of course the example of dick and jane is silly, but in some cases such a theory could be more applicable.

One example I think is better involves you and your next door neighbor. Let's say "Dick", your neighbor, has a large sycamore tree in his yard that provides your yard with shade on hot summer days. Dick believes, however, that in a lightening storm the tree could fall on his house, so he goes out in the yard with a chainsaw to cut it down. You, seeing Dick with his chainsaw, approach him and explain that you would prefer he leave the tree standing. Of course, unless you offer Dick some renumeration in exchange for leaving the tree standing, he has no incentive to do so and will cut it down. The externality here is the lack of shade and the increased air conditioning bills you'll have to pay when the tree is gone... but with clearly defined property rights, perhaps you and Dick could come to an agreement. Maybe you agree that if the tree should ever fall on Dick's house, you'd help pay for the remodelling.

See how clear property rights and negotiations can result in the elimination of a negative externality? You never had to SUE the Dick next door and he were able to convince him to leave the tree standing in exchange for your assurance that his roof would be fixed if it fell. Hualla, the Coase Theorem, sans dog.

powered by performancing firefox

Sunday, March 4, 2007

AP Econ: How do Banks Create Money?

The following is a rather clear explanation of the process that leads to the creation of new money by banks, written by Econ educator Dick Brunelle. I find this much more straightforward and easier to understand than your text.

How is money created? In addition to currency that is printed by the government and put into circulation by the FED, money is created through the fractional reserve banking system. Banks when they receive a checkable deposit from a customer will keep some of that money in reserve and lend the balance. The bank is required to keep a certain amount in required reserves. Any additional reserves are referred to as excess reserves. Let’s follow a $10,000 deposit of a customer. We will assume a 10% reserve requirement. The T account for the bank will look like this:

Assets: Required reserve = $1,000 and Excess reserve = $9,000
Liabilities: Checkable deposits = $10,000

The bank will now have a liability to the customer of $10,000. It will also have required reserves of $1,000 and excess reserves of $9,000. It can choose to make a loan of $9,000 with the excess reserves. Let’s take a look at what happens if the bank makes that loan.

Assets: Required reserves = $1,000, Excess reserves = $0, and Loans = $9,000

Liabilities: Checkable deposits = $10,000

Now what happens to that $9,000 that was lent to another customer? Let’s assume that person deposits the $9,000 into her bank and creates the following change in the T account for that bank:

  • Assets: Required reserves = $900, Excess reserves = $0 and Loans = $8,100
  • Liabilities: Checkable deposits = $9,000

We have assumed that the bank has made loans with the full additional $8,100 available from Excess reserves. This process will continue in the banking system until there is no more to lend from the initial deposit. We can calculate the entire amount of money created from the initial deposit by using the banking or money multiplier. The following is the formula:

Money Multiplier (m) = 1 / RR (reserve requirement)

Our reserve requirement is 10%. The money multiplier is 1/.1=10

The initial deposit of $10,000 will lead to a total in money supply of $100,000. Now here is where we need to be careful semantically. Since the original $10,000 was already a part of the money supply, the additional amount of money created is $100,000 minus the original $10,000 or $ 90,000.

If the original $10,000 came from the FED then the total amount of money creation would be $100,000 since money at the FED is not part of the money supply.

The banking multiplier leakages

There are two events that can minimize the banking multiplier:

  1. Banks keeping excess reserves
  2. Borrowers keeping currency and not redepositing the amount of the loan.

Note: Students will frequently be asked to compute how much money will be created given a certain circumstance. If the banking multiplier is 5 and the FED adds new money into circulation by buying bonds, lowering discount rate or lowering the reserve requirement, then multiply the amount by: Example Fed buys $10,000 of bonds, how much money is created? $10,000 X 5 = $50,000

But if the question states that the Bank has excess reserves and uses this money to make a $10,000 loan, how much money is created? $10,000 X 5 = $50,000 minus $10,000 (original amount already in reserves) = $40,000. The same would hold true if a person took $10,000 of cash in put it in the bank. Students must account for the fact that the original $10,000 was already in existence.

Starbucks Economics: a discriminating cappuccino

Solving the mystery of the elusive "short" cappuccino

An enlightening article from the "Undercover Economist". See if you can identify the concepts from microeconomics. Post comments and insights below!